← Back to Agreebuddy

Terms of Service

Last updated: August 12, 2026

Short version: Agreebuddy is a reading aid, not a lawyer. It uses AI to highlight things worth a closer look — it can miss things or get things wrong, and it isn't a substitute for reading the full document yourself or talking to an actual attorney about anything that matters.

1. Acceptance of these terms

By using Agreebuddy, you agree to these terms. If you don't agree with them, please don't use the service.

2. What Agreebuddy is — and isn't

Agreebuddy is an AI-assisted tool that reads contracts, leases, and other agreements and flags points that may be worth your attention. It is provided for informational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice, does not create an attorney-client relationship, and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional legal review — especially for anything with real financial, legal, or personal consequences.

3. AI limitations

The flags and explanations Agreebuddy generates are produced automatically by an AI model. AI systems can be incomplete, inaccurate, or miss issues that a careful human reader — or a lawyer — would catch. Always read the full document yourself, and don't treat Agreebuddy's output as a complete or guaranteed list of everything that matters in a document.

4. Acceptable use

5. No warranty

Agreebuddy is provided "as is," without warranties of any kind, express or implied — including as to accuracy, completeness, or availability of the service.

6. Limitation of liability

To the maximum extent permitted by law, Agreebuddy and its creators are not liable for any damages or losses arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service or its output.

7. Changes to the service or these terms

We may change, suspend, or discontinue any part of Agreebuddy at any time, and may update these terms as the service evolves. Continued use after a change means you accept the updated terms.

8. Governing law

These terms are governed by the laws of the State of California, USA, without regard to conflict-of-law principles.